How should we interpret CVSS severity scores?

CVSS estimates technical severity, but it does not automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, asset criticality, known exploitation, and whether compensating controls exist. A Medium CVSS on an exposed production system can be more urgent than a Critical on an isolated non-production host.

Vulnerability Database

Q: What is a Vulnerability (CVE) and why does it matter?

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

Q: What's the difference between a vulnerability, an exploit, and a zero-day?

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. Risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Q: Why do vulnerabilities keep reappearing in our environment?

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete asset discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host.

Q: How do we prioritize remediation without burning out the team?

Use a repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress so remediation is steady, not reactive.

Q: How can SynScan help reduce vulnerability risk over time?

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.

363,159

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Microsoft Kiota: Path traversal in generated plugin manifest static_template.file reference (percent-encoding bypass) — Microsoft.OpenApi.Kiota

Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

Impact

Kiota generates AI plugin manifests from an OpenAPI description. When the description contains an x-ai-capabilities response semantics static_template (or the adaptive-card extension x-ai-adaptive-card), the file reference is written into the generated manifest's response_semantics.static_template.file and is later resolved by the AI host relative to the plugin package.

An attacker who controls or tampers with the OpenAPI description consumed by Kiota can supply a file reference that resolves outside the manifest package (e.g. ../../../../etc/passwd, an absolute path, or a file:// / http(s):// URI). When the generated manifest is deployed and consumed by an AI host, this can lead to inclusion or disclosure of files outside the intended package boundary (CWE-22 Path Traversal, CWE-829 Inclusion of Functionality from an Untrusted Control Sphere).

A mitigation shipped in v1.32.5 (ExtensionResponseSemanticsStaticTemplate.IsSafeFileReference) rejected literal traversal, rooted paths, drive-qualified paths, and absolute URIs. However, that check inspected the raw reference string, so percent-encoded payloads bypassed every check and were still emitted verbatim. Examples that were incorrectly accepted as safe:

| Input | Decodes to | |-------|-----------| | %2e%2e/card.json | ../card.json | | ..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2f..%2fetc%2fpasswd | ../../../../../../etc/passwd | | file%3A%2F%2F%2Fetc%2Fpasswd | file:///etc/passwd | | %2e%2e%2f%2e%2e%2f%2e%2e%2fetc%2fpasswd | ../../../etc/passwd |

Multi-level (double) encoding such as %252e%252e%252fcard.json was also affected. A follow-up review found additional residual bypasses of the same validator: an embedded NUL byte (%00) that truncated the path and defeated the parent-directory segment check, encoding nested deeper than the decode budget (which failed open), and Unicode full-width homoglyphs (e.g. %EF%BC%8E%EF%BC%8E → ．．).

Patches

The percent-encoding bypass is fixed by decoding the reference (bounded multi-pass) before validation: https://github.com/microsoft/kiota/pull/7910
Residual bypasses (NUL / control characters, decode-budget fail-open, Unicode homoglyphs) are fixed by failing closed on residual encoding, rejecting control characters, and NFKC-folding before validation: https://github.com/microsoft/kiota/pull/7913 (tracking issue https://github.com/microsoft/kiota/issues/7912)

Users should upgrade to the first released Microsoft.OpenApi.Kiota version that includes these fixes (the release following 1.33.0).

Workarounds

Only generate clients/plugins from trusted OpenAPI descriptions.
Review generated plugin manifests before deployment and reject any response_semantics.static_template.file value that is not a simple relative path within the adaptiveCards/ package folder (no .., no rooted/absolute paths, no URIs, no percent-encoded separators).

References

CWE-22: Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')
CWE-829: Inclusion of Functionality from an Untrusted Control Sphere
Affected code: src/Kiota.Builder/OpenApiExtensions/OpenApiAiCapabilitiesExtension.cs (IsSafeFileReference) and enforcement in src/Kiota.Builder/Plugins/PluginsGenerationService.cs.

Published: Jul 24, 2026
Updated: Jul 25, 2026
GHSA: GHSA-p5rm-jg5c-8c77
Severity: Medium
Exploit:
CISA KEV:

No technical information available.

CWEs:

OWASP TOP 10:

A5 - Broken Access Control

Affected Software
References

Software	From	Fixed in
Microsoft.OpenApi.Kiota	-	1.34.0

Deep Security Visibility Without the Complexity

SynScan provides clear, real-time security insights so you can monitor your attack surface, spot risks early, and act fast—without extra complexity.

No setup fees
5-min deployment
Cancel anytime

Book a Demo

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a Vulnerability (CVE) and why does it matter?

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.