Vulnerability Database

327,594

Total vulnerabilities in the database

MultipartParser denial of service with too many fields or files

Impact

The MultipartParser using the package python-multipart accepts an unlimited number of multipart parts (form fields or files).

Processing too many parts results in high CPU usage and high memory usage, eventually leading to an <abbr title="out of memory">OOM</abbr> process kill.

This can be triggered by sending too many small form fields with no content, or too many empty files.

For this to take effect application code has to:

  • Have python-multipart installed and
  • call request.form()
    • or via another framework like FastAPI, using form field parameters or UploadFile parameters, which in turn calls request.form().

Patches

The vulnerability is solved in Starlette 0.25.0 by making the maximum fields and files customizable and with a sensible default (1000).

Applications will be secure by just upgrading their Starlette version to 0.25.0 (or FastAPI to 0.92.0).

If application code needs to customize the new max field and file number, there are new request.form() parameters (with the default values):

  • max_files=1000
  • max_fields=1000

Workarounds

Applications that don't install python-multipart or that don't use form fields are safe.

In older versions, it's also possible to instead of calling request.form() call request.stream() and parse the form data in internal code.

In most cases, the best solution is to upgrade the Starlette version.

References

This was reported in private by @das7pad via internal email. He also coordinated the fix across multiple frameworks and parsers.

The details about how multipart/form-data is structured and parsed are in the RFC 7578.

No technical information available.

CWEs:

Software From Fixed in
Python icon starlette - 0.25.0

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.