Vulnerability Database

413,619

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Nodemailer: A ">" inside a quoted local part ends an angle-addr early in addressparser, delivering to a domain the header does not name — nodemailer

Improper Input Validation

Vulnerability summary

addressparser ends an angle-addr at the first > it sees, including one inside a quoted local part, a comment or a domain literal. The domain is then read off the text in front of that >. <"[email protected]>"@good.com> is the mailbox "[email protected]>"@good.com under RFC 5322, and Nodemailer read it as an address at evil.com. The unbracketed spelling of the same value was already read correctly. Affected: 3.0.0 through 10.1.3.

Attacker capabilities

The attacker controls the text of a recipient or sender address that an application passes to Nodemailer, for example a To value entered in a contact or invite form, or the header of an inbound message parsed with mailparser. No access to the application, its configuration or its credentials is needed. The value is a syntactically valid RFC 5322 address that conformant parsers accept without defects.

Realistic exploitation scenario

An application lets users send invitations or notifications only to addresses at an allowed domain and validates the submitted value with a conformant parser or by checking its domain. The attacker submits <"[email protected]>"@good.com>, which validates as a good.com mailbox. Nodemailer then parses the same value, issues RCPT TO:<"\"a"@evil.com> and the message, with whatever content the application puts into it, is delivered to the attacker's domain. The security boundary crossed is the application's recipient allow list. In the inbound direction, mailparser reports a different address than a conformant reader of the same header, so a display or policy layer built on the two disagrees.

Proof of concept

const addressparser = require('nodemailer/lib/addressparser'); console.log(addressparser("<\"[email protected]>\"@good.com>")); // [ { address: '"[email protected]', name: '@good.com>' } ]

Python's email._header_value_parser.get_address_list reads the same value as "[email protected]>"@good.com, with no defects reported.

The envelope a message gets is built from the same parse, so sendMail({ to: "<\"[email protected]>\"@good.com>" }) issues the RCPT TO shown above.

Security impact

Mail that an application intends for an allowed domain is delivered to a domain chosen by the attacker, which discloses its content. It is a security vulnerability rather than a parsing bug because the misreading only occurs for values that a conformant validator approves, so validation done the right way is bypassed. Affected are applications that pass user influenced addresses to Nodemailer and consumers of the standalone parser such as mailparser.

The fix tracks quoted strings, comments and domain literals inside an angle-addr and reads only a > outside them.

Found in an internal review of addressparser on 2026-10-18. Verified on 3.0.0, 6.9.16 and 10.1.3.

  • Published: Oct 23, 2026
  • Updated: Oct 24, 2026
  • GHSA: GHSA-85x2-q946-cp5h
  • Severity: Medium
  • Exploit:
  • CISA KEV:

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: Medium
  • Score: 6.5
  • AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N

Is nodemailer exposed on your perimeter?

A vulnerability database tells you what is broken. Attack surface management tells you where it is running: it discovers your internet-facing assets and flags the ones affected by issues like this one.

What is attack surface management? →

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.