Nuxt dev server discloses project root and workspace UUID via the Chrome DevTools workspace endpoint — @clerk / nuxt
Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized ActorImpact
When a Nuxt dev server is bound to a network-reachable interface (for example nuxt dev --host for on-device testing), the default-enabled Chrome DevTools workspace endpoint GET /.well-known/appspecific/com.chrome.devtools.json returns the absolute project root (workspace.root, i.e. rootDir) and a persistent per-project workspace UUID.
GHSA-rq7w-g337-39qq added a gate (isLocalDevRequest) intended to restrict this endpoint to local requests, but that gate is header-based: it trusts request metadata rather than the connected peer address. A request with no Sec-Fetch-Site, Origin, and Referer headers (normal for a non-browser client such as curl) is treated as local, and the Host allow-list is compared against the attacker-supplied Host header. As a result, any unauthenticated host that can reach the dev server on the LAN can retrieve the project's absolute filesystem path and workspace UUID, for example with curl -H 'Host: localhost' http://<dev-host-lan-ip>:3000/.well-known/appspecific/com.chrome.devtools.json.
This is information disclosure only: there is no file read, file write, or code execution reachable from the endpoint. It requires the dev server to be reachable beyond loopback and experimental.chromeDevtoolsProjectSettings to be enabled (it defaults to true). Production builds are unaffected, because the endpoint is registered only as a development handler.
Patches
Fixed in [email protected] and [email protected]. The endpoint now additionally requires the connected TCP peer to be a loopback address, verified from the socket rather than from request headers, so a non-loopback LAN client is rejected regardless of the Host, Origin, Referer, or Sec-Fetch-* headers it sends. The shared header-based check is left unchanged, so the CSRF / same-origin behaviour that other dev handlers rely on is preserved. After this fix, Chrome DevTools workspace auto-mapping only works when the browser reaches the dev server over loopback (localhost / 127.0.0.1 / ::1), which matches the feature's intent (the browser and dev server sharing a filesystem).
Workarounds
- Do not bind the dev server to a non-loopback interface on an untrusted network, or restrict access to the dev port with a firewall.
- Disable the feature by setting
experimental.chromeDevtoolsProjectSettings: falseinnuxt.config.
| Software | From | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
@clerk / nuxt
|
4.4.7 | 4.5.1 |
|
@clerk / nuxt
|
3.21.7 | 3.21.10 |
- https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/commit/00f71bb6517abff67257c8ea1fcdc777b938b68d
- https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/commit/e30c611ea03240f341fe784ab1711aa6424da2fa
- https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/releases/tag/v3.21.10
- https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/releases/tag/v4.5.1
- https://github.com/nuxt/nuxt/security/advisories/GHSA-7c4v-fwgw-9rf7
Deep Security Visibility Without the Complexity
SynScan provides clear, real-time security insights so you can monitor your attack surface, spot risks early, and act fast—without extra complexity.
- No setup fees
- 5-min deployment
- Cancel anytime
Frequently Asked Questions
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.