Vulnerability Database

363,159

Total vulnerabilities in the database

OmniFaces: Forged combined-resource IDs and related output/push boundaries — org.omnifaces / omnifaces

Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity

1. Forged combined-resource IDs

CombinedResourceInfo accepts a path-derived ID without an authenticity check, inflates it without an output limit, converts it to attacker-selected resource identifiers, and retains unique IDs in an unbounded static cache. In bounded tests, 20,754 encoded bytes inflated to 16,000,000 characters (about 770:1; about 49 MB observed heap delta), and 200 unique IDs added 200 permanent cache entries. A legitimately shaped short ID remained about 1:1, while malformed input was rejected; the missing distinction is between a server-issued ID and an attacker-minted but structurally valid ID.

The minimal application also confirmed three sink tails from the same forged-ID root:

  • A wildcard CDN mapping performed a server-side fetch and relayed the exact loopback-canary body. This requires the documented combined-resource and wildcard-CDN configuration.
  • A forged inner .xhtml resource bypassed the excluded-resource boundary and returned its raw content.
  • A forged omnifaces.graphic inner resource plus a canary Host header caused an outbound GET to that host. This result is blind and deployment-dependent; I am not claiming arbitrary-scheme or arbitrary-destination SSRF.

These behaviors reproduce after the fix for CVE-2026-41883 / GHSA-vp6r-9m58-5xv8. That advisory concerned EL evaluation order in the wildcard CDN path. This report has a different root: unsigned combined IDs and missing decode/cache bounds, with separately demonstrated residual sink behavior.

2. Source-map cache

With the documented optional source-map handler above a synthetic resource handler, 40 unique missing combined-resource requests grew the process-wide source-map cache from 13 to 92 entries. It has no size or eviction bound. This has a separate cache, configuration prerequisite, and fix from family 1.

3. HashParam callback output

A URL-fragment value containing a single-quote JavaScript payload was stored by o:hashParam and later written unescaped into the Ajax callback script. On the follow-up Ajax render, real Chrome executed the canary window.__omniXss=1337. This requires a page using o:hashParam and the follow-up Ajax render.

4. Session/view push-channel replay

A fresh WebSocket client with no HTTP cookie connected using a victim's session-scoped channel ID and received the victim's subsequent push. The code checks application-wide ID existence but does not bind the handshake to the current HTTP session, despite the documented current-session guarantee. The UUID remains an unguessable bearer-token prerequisite; this is replay after token exposure, not brute force.

5. Push idle-connection and fanout behavior

Twelve independent clients joined one application-scoped channel and all 12 received the same push. Current code sets every accepted session's maximum idle timeout to zero, retains sessions in an unbounded per-channel queue, and walks the full queue on each push. I am reporting the demonstrated mechanism as a bounded design weakness: container connection limits remain an outer bound, and I am not claiming unbounded heap growth from the 12-client test.

Intentionally excluded leads

  • A duplicate-Range response-amplification lead was disproved. Twenty-four ranges produced only one response body because the stream wrapper closes after the first range. I am not reporting it as a security issue.
  • The older Servlets.facesRedirect XML issue is fixed on the current branch. I am not reporting it as a new current-upstream issue.

Expected invariants

  • Only server-issued combined IDs should be accepted; decoding and caches should be bounded; excluded resources and dynamic handlers should not become attacker-selected inner resources.
  • Dynamic URLs should not derive an outbound destination from an untrusted Host header.
  • Source-map lookups should not create unbounded process-lifetime state.
  • HashParam values must be escaped for a JavaScript string inside an XML CDATA callback.
  • Session/view push subscriptions should be bound to the owning HTTP session or authenticated principal; idle limits and per-channel caps should remain operator-controllable.

Suggested fixes and available evidence

  • Authenticate generated combined IDs with a per-deployment secret, cap inflated output, bound the combined cache, and avoid caching failed loads.
  • Require an existing/registered inner resource before wildcard remapping and reject excluded resource types at serve time.
  • Derive dynamic-resource origins from trusted configuration rather than the request Host value.
  • Bound or evict the source-map cache.
  • Apply JavaScript-string plus CDATA-safe encoding to HashParam callback values.
  • Capture and verify HTTP-session or principal ownership during the WebSocket handshake; retain a finite idle timeout and configurable per-channel limits.

Daniel Birtwhistle

  • Published: Jul 24, 2026
  • Updated: Jul 25, 2026
  • GHSA: GHSA-fp43-vj7g-pg92
  • Severity: High
  • Exploit:
  • CISA KEV:

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: High
  • Score: 7.5
  • AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.