Vulnerability Database

328,409

Total vulnerabilities in the database

OpenClaw ACP client has permission auto-approval bypass via untrusted tool metadata

Vulnerability Summary

The OpenClaw ACP client could auto-approve tool calls based on untrusted metadata and permissive name heuristics. A malicious or compromised ACP tool invocation could bypass expected interactive approval prompts for read-class operations.

Affected Packages / Versions

  • Package: npm openclaw
  • Affected published versions: <= 2026.2.22-2 (latest published as of February 24, 2026 is 2026.2.22-2)
  • Patched in code on main: 2026.2.23 (released)

Technical Details

  • Permission classification trusted incoming toolCall.kind and heuristic name matching.
  • Non-core read-like names and spoofed kind metadata could reach auto-approve paths.
  • read operations were not scoped strongly enough to cwd in all metadata/title forms.

Fix

  • Require trusted core tool IDs for auto-approval and ignore untrusted toolCall.kind as an authorization source.
  • Scope read auto-approval to cwd-resolved paths.
  • Add stricter tool-name validation and regression coverage for spoofed kind and non-core read-like names.

Affected Functions

  • resolvePermissionRequest
  • resolveToolNameForPermission
  • shouldAutoApproveToolCall

Fix Commit(s)

  • 12cc754332f9a7c92e158ce7644aa22df79c0904
  • 63dcd28ae0be2de1c75af09cc81841cebeec068f

Found using MCPwner

Thanks @nedlir for reporting.

No technical information available.

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.