Vulnerability Database

328,409

Total vulnerabilities in the database

OpenClaw: BlueBubbles (optional plugin) pairing/allowlist mismatch when allowFrom is empty

Summary

BlueBubbles is an optional OpenClaw channel plugin. A configuration-sensitive access-control mismatch allowed DM senders to be treated as authorized when dmPolicy was pairing or allowlist and allowFrom was empty/unset.

Severity Rationale (Medium)

Severity is set to medium because:

  • this affects an optional plugin, not core messaging surfaces;
  • many deployments use owner-controlled/private BlueBubbles identities with limited external reachability;
  • practical exploitability depends on an untrusted sender being able to reach that specific BlueBubbles account identifier.

In typical personal/self-hosted BlueBubbles setups, the mapped Apple identity is single-owner and not broadly reachable, so this is usually low practical risk.

Risk is higher in deployments where the identifier is publicly reachable and/or agent tool permissions are broad.

Technical Details

  1. BlueBubbles DM policy defaults to pairing (dmPolicy ?? "pairing").
  2. Effective allowlist can be empty (effectiveAllowFrom).
  3. DM/reaction authorization called isAllowedBlueBubblesSender(...).
  4. That delegated to shared isAllowedParsedChatSender(...), which previously returned true for empty allowlists.
  5. Result: unknown senders could bypass intended pairing/allowlist gating when allowFrom was empty.

Affected Packages / Versions

  • Package: openclaw (npm)
  • Vulnerable versions: <= 2026.2.21-2
  • Planned fixed version: 2026.2.22

Fix

The shared parsed-chat allowlist helper now fails closed on empty allowlists, restoring expected BlueBubbles DM gating behavior. BlueBubbles inbound gating was also refactored to use one shared DM/group decision helper for both message and reaction paths to reduce future drift.

Fix Commit(s)

  • 9632b9bcf032c5f2280c3103961fde912ab1f920
  • 2ba6de7eaad812e5e8603018e14e54e96bdd57dd
  • 51c0893673de8e5cea64e64351dbfa4680ba0dec
  • 4540790cb62412676f7b61cfc6e47443f84a251e

OpenClaw thanks @tdjackey for reporting.

No technical information available.

CWEs:

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.