Vulnerability Database

328,409

Total vulnerabilities in the database

OpenClaw: LINE group allowlist scope mismatch with DM pairing-store entries

Summary

In specific LINE configurations, sender IDs approved through DM pairing could also satisfy group allowlist checks when operators expected group sender access to be scoped only to explicit group allowlists.

Affected Packages / Versions

  • Package: openclaw (npm)
  • Latest published version at triage/update time: 2026.2.25
  • Affected: <= 2026.2.25
  • Patched: >= 2026.2.26 (planned next release)

Impact

This is a group-authorization scope mismatch. DM pairing-store entries could influence group sender authorization in allowlist mode.

Technical Details

Root cause: group allowlist composition inherited pairing-store entries intended for DM approvals. Under default DM pairing policy, a DM-paired sender could match group allowlist checks.

Fixes on main:

  • isolate group allowlist composition from pairing-store entries
  • centralize shared DM/group allowlist composition to preserve DM-only pairing behavior
  • add regression coverage for LINE and Mattermost policy paths

Fix Commit(s)

  • 8bdda7a651c21e98faccdbbd73081e79cffe8be0
  • 892a9c24b0f6118729ab5b5f5499b1a7e792dd15 (follow-up refactor hardening)

Release Process Note

patched_versions is pre-set to >= 2026.2.26 so once npm 2026.2.26 is published, this advisory can be published directly without additional version-field edits.

Thanks @tdjackey for reporting.

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: Unknown
  • Score:
  • AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N

CWEs:

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.