Vulnerability Database

349,003

Total vulnerabilities in the database

OpenClaw: Plivo V2 verified replay identity drifts on query-only variants — openclaw

Authentication Bypass by Capture-replay

Summary

Before v2026.3.23, the Plivo V2 verification path treated query-only variants of the same signed request as fresh verified work. Plivo V2 signatures authenticate baseUrl + nonce, but the replay key was derived from the full verification URL including the query string, so unsigned query-only changes minted a new verifiedRequestKey.

Affected Packages / Versions

  • Package: openclaw (npm)
  • Affected: < 2026.3.23
  • Fixed: >= 2026.3.23
  • Latest released tag checked: v2026.3.23-2 (630f1479c44f78484dfa21bb407cbe6f171dac87)
  • Latest published npm version checked: 2026.3.23-2

Root Cause

The vulnerable logic lived in extensions/voice-call/src/webhook-security.ts. V2 signature validation already canonicalized to the base URL without query parameters, but the replay key used the full verificationUrl, letting query-only variants bypass replay identity stability.

Fix Commit(s)

  • b0ce53a79cf63834660270513e26d921899b4e5bfix(voice-call): stabilize plivo v2 replay keys

Release Status

The fix commit is contained in released tags v2026.3.23 and v2026.3.23-2. The latest shipped tag and npm release both include the fix.

Code-Level Confirmation

  • extensions/voice-call/src/webhook-security.ts now derives the V2 replay key with createPlivoV2ReplayKey(...), which hashes getBaseUrlNoQuery(url) plus the nonce.
  • extensions/voice-call/src/webhook-security.test.ts contains the regression test treats query-only V2 variants as the same verified request.

OpenClaw thanks @smaeljaish771 for reporting.

  • Published: Mar 26, 2026
  • Updated: Mar 27, 2026
  • GHSA: GHSA-cg6c-q2hx-69h7
  • Severity: High
  • Exploit:
  • CISA KEV:

No technical information available.

CWEs:

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.