Vulnerability Database

328,409

Total vulnerabilities in the database

OpenClaw's avatar symlink traversal can expose out-of-workspace local files

Summary

OpenClaw avatar handling allowed a symlink traversal path that could expose local files outside an agent workspace through gateway avatar surfaces.

Affected Packages / Versions

  • Package: openclaw (npm)
  • Affected versions: <= 2026.2.21, plus prereleases 2026.2.21-1 and 2026.2.21-2
  • Latest published version at triage time (2026-02-22): 2026.2.21-2 (affected)
  • Planned patched version (pre-set for release workflow): 2026.2.22

Details

In vulnerable builds, local avatar resolution could follow symlinks and return file bytes from outside the configured workspace boundary.

The issue was hardened in two paths:

  1. Gateway avatar metadata resolution now enforces canonical containment, O_NOFOLLOW, and fd/file-identity checks.
  2. Control UI avatar serving now rejects symlink paths and enforces fd/file-identity and size checks before reads.

Fix Commit(s)

  • 3d0337504349954237d09e4d957df5cb844d5e77
  • 6970c2c2db3ee069ef0fff0ade5cfbdd0134f9d2

Release Process Note

patched_versions is pre-set to >= 2026.2.22 so after npm release, the remaining action is to publish this advisory.

Impact

Confidentiality impact only: local files readable by the OpenClaw process could be disclosed via avatar response surfaces.

OpenClaw thanks @tdjackey for reporting.

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: Unknown
  • Score:
  • AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.