Vulnerability Database

328,409

Total vulnerabilities in the database

OpenClaw's Slack reaction/pin sender-policy consistency issue in non-message ingress

Summary

OpenClaw Slack monitor handled reaction_* and pin_* non-message events before applying sender-policy checks consistently.

In affected versions, these events could be added to system-event context even when sender policy would not normally allow them.

Affected Packages / Versions

  • Package: npm openclaw
  • Latest published affected version confirmed: 2026.2.24 (npm latest as of February 26, 2026)
  • Affected range: <= 2026.2.24
  • Patched version : 2026.2.25

Technical Details

  • reaction_* and pin_* handlers now route through shared sender authorization (authorizeSlackSystemEventSender).
  • Enforced checks now include:
    • DM dmPolicy / allowFrom
    • channel users allowlist enforcement for non-DM channels
    • channel-level allow checks before system-event enqueue
  • Regression coverage added for DM allow/deny and channel-user allowlist deny paths.

Fix Commit(s)

  • aedf62ac7e669a89c7b299201bf6537dc6b12e0e
  • 75dfb71e4e8b7c2feba5a8ca662f92ea840e0147

Impact

Low-severity policy-consistency issue in Slack non-message event ingress. This may introduce unexpected reaction/pin context signals from senders outside configured policy.

Release Process Note

patched_versions is pre-set to planned release 2026.2.25. Advisory published with npm release 2026.2.25.

OpenClaw thanks @tdjackey for reporting.

No technical information available.

CWEs:

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.