Vulnerability Database

413,830

Total vulnerabilities in the database

PocketMine-MP has LogDoS by many junk properties in client data JWT in LoginPacket — pocketmine / pocketmine-mp

Logging of Excessive Data

Impact

Attackers can fill the body of the clientData JWT in LoginPacket with lots of junk properties, causing the server to flood warning messages, as well as wasting CPU time.

This happens because the JsonMapper instance used to process the JWT body is configured to warn on unexpected properties instead of rejecting them outright. While this behaviour increases flexibility for random changes introduced by Microsoft, it also creates vulnerabilities if not handled carefully.

This vulnerability affects PocketMine-MP servers exposed to a public network where unknown actors may have access.

Patches

This issue was fixed in c1d4a813fb8c21bfd8b9affd040da864b794df71 by restricting the number of unknown properties to 10, and rejecting the packet if this limit is exceeded. This continues to tolerate random additions to the JWT between versions, while preventing the logger from being abused by clients to slow down the server.

Workarounds

Plugins can handle DataPacketReceiveEvent to capture LoginPacket, and pre-process the clientData JWT to ensure it doesn't have any unusual properties in it. This can be achieved using JsonMapper (see the original affected code below) and setting the bExceptionOnUndefinedProperty flag to true. A JsonMapper_Exception will be thrown if the JWT is problematic.

However, it's important to caveat that this approach may cause login failures if any unexpected properties appear out of the blue in future versions (which has happened in the past).

References

Affected code:

https://github.com/pmmp/PocketMine-MP/blob/5.41.1/src/network/mcpe/handler/LoginPacketHandler.php#L289-L303 https://github.com/pmmp/PocketMine-MP/blob/5.41.1/src/network/mcpe/handler/LoginPacketHandler.php#L334-L350

  • Published: Apr 15, 2026
  • Updated: Apr 16, 2026
  • GHSA: GHSA-xp4f-g2cm-rhg7
  • Severity: Medium
  • Exploit:
  • CISA KEV:

No technical information available.

CWEs:

Is pocketmine-mp exposed on your perimeter?

A vulnerability database tells you what is broken. Attack surface management tells you where it is running: it discovers your internet-facing assets and flags the ones affected by issues like this one.

What is attack surface management? →

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.