Vulnerability Database

325,773

Total vulnerabilities in the database

vLLM vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service

Summary

A recent review identified several regular expressions in the vllm codebase that are susceptible to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) attacks. These patterns, if fed with crafted or malicious input, may cause severe performance degradation due to catastrophic backtracking.

1. vllm/lora/utils.py Line 173

https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/2858830c39da0ae153bc1328dbba7680f5fbebe1/vllm/lora/utils.py#L173 Risk Description:

  • The regex r"\((.*?)\)\$?$" matches content inside parentheses. If input such as ((((a|)+)+)+) is passed in, it can cause catastrophic backtracking, leading to a ReDoS vulnerability.
  • Using .*? (non-greedy match) inside group parentheses can be highly sensitive to input length and nesting complexity.

Remediation Suggestions:

  • Limit the input string length.
  • Use a non-recursive matching approach, or write a regex with stricter content constraints.
  • Consider using possessive quantifiers or atomic groups (not supported in Python yet), or split and process before regex matching.

2. vllm/entrypoints/openai/tool_parsers/phi4mini_tool_parser.py Line 52

https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/2858830c39da0ae153bc1328dbba7680f5fbebe1/vllm/entrypoints/openai/tool_parsers/phi4mini_tool_parser.py#L52

Risk Description:

  • The regex r'functools\[(.*?)\]' uses .*? to match content inside brackets, together with re.DOTALL. If the input contains a large number of nested or crafted brackets, it can cause backtracking and ReDoS.

Remediation Suggestions:

  • Limit the length of model_output.
  • Use a stricter, non-greedy pattern (avoid matching across extraneous nesting).
  • Prefer re.finditer() and enforce a length constraint on each match.

3. vllm/entrypoints/openai/serving_chat.py Line 351

https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/2858830c39da0ae153bc1328dbba7680f5fbebe1/vllm/entrypoints/openai/serving_chat.py#L351

Risk Description:

  • The regex r'.*"parameters":\s*(.*)' can trigger backtracking if current_text is very long and contains repeated structures.
  • Especially when processing strings from unknown sources, .* matching any content is high risk.

Remediation Suggestions:

  • Use a more specific pattern (e.g., via JSON parsing).
  • Impose limits on current_text length.
  • Avoid using .* to capture large blocks of text; prefer structured parsing when possible.

4. benchmarks/benchmark_serving_structured_output.py Line 650

https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/2858830c39da0ae153bc1328dbba7680f5fbebe1/benchmarks/benchmark_serving_structured_output.py#L650

Risk Description:

  • The regex r'\{.*\}' is used to extract JSON inside curly braces. If the actual string is very long with unbalanced braces, it can cause backtracking, leading to a ReDoS vulnerability.
  • Although this is used for benchmark correctness checking, it should still handle abnormal inputs carefully.

Remediation Suggestions:

  • Limit the length of actual.
  • Prefer stepwise search for { and } or use a robust JSON extraction tool.
  • Recommend first locating the range with simple string search, then applying regex.

Fix

  • https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/18454

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: Unknown
  • Score:
  • AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.