Vulnerability Database

355,921

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "debian_linux"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/debian_linux/1.2.3

debian / debian_linux

15498 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
High August 17, 2012 8/17/12
== 6.0
Medium August 14, 2012 8/14/12
== 6.0
Low August 13, 2012 8/13/12
== 6.0
Low August 7, 2012 8/7/12
*
High August 6, 2012 8/6/12
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium July 25, 2012 7/25/12
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low July 25, 2012 7/25/12
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low July 24, 2012 7/24/12
== 6.0
Low July 22, 2012 7/22/12
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low July 18, 2012 7/18/12
== 6.0
Medium July 12, 2012 7/12/12
== 6.0
Low July 5, 2012 7/5/12
== 6.0
Low July 3, 2012 7/3/12
== 7.0
== 6.0
High June 21, 2012 6/21/12
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium June 17, 2012 6/17/12
== 6.0
Critical June 7, 2012 6/7/12
== 7.0
== 6.0
High June 5, 2012 6/5/12
== 6.0
Medium June 5, 2012 6/5/12
== 6.0
High June 5, 2012 6/5/12
== 7.0
== 6.0
High June 5, 2012 6/5/12
== 6.0
Medium June 5, 2012 6/5/12
== 6.0
Medium June 5, 2012 6/5/12
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium June 5, 2012 6/5/12
== 6.0
Medium June 5, 2012 6/5/12
== 6.0
High June 5, 2012 6/5/12
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low June 2, 2012 6/2/12
== 6.0
Medium May 17, 2012 5/17/12
== 6.0
Critical May 11, 2012 5/11/12
== 6.0
Low April 22, 2012 4/22/12
== 6.0
== 7.0
Medium April 17, 2012 4/17/12
== 6.0
High March 22, 2012 3/22/12
== 6.0
High February 1, 2012 2/1/12
== 5.0
== 6.0
High February 1, 2012 2/1/12
== 5.0
== 6.0
High February 1, 2012 2/1/12
== 5.0
== 6.0
Low January 28, 2012 1/28/12
== 5.0
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low January 18, 2012 1/18/12
== 5.0
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium January 8, 2012 1/8/12
== 5.0
== 6.0
Medium January 8, 2012 1/8/12
== 5.0
== 6.0
High January 7, 2012 1/7/12
== 5.0
== 7.0
== 6.0
High December 25, 2011 12/25/11
== 5.0
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium December 24, 2011 12/24/11
== 5.0
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium December 15, 2011 12/15/11
== 6.0
Medium December 15, 2011 12/15/11
== 6.0
Medium December 13, 2011 12/13/11
== 5.0
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium December 8, 2011 12/8/11
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium November 29, 2011 11/29/11
== 5.0
== 7.0
== 6.0
High November 11, 2011 11/11/11
== 6.0
High November 11, 2011 11/11/11
== 6.0
High October 10, 2011 10/10/11
== 5.0
== 7.0
== 6.0
High September 23, 2011 9/23/11
== 5.0
== 7.0
== 6.0

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.