Vulnerability Database

355,921

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "debian_linux"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/debian_linux/1.2.3

debian / debian_linux

15498 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Medium September 19, 2011 9/19/11
== 5.0
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low September 6, 2011 9/6/11
== 5.0
== 6.0
High August 29, 2011 8/29/11
== 5.0
== 7.0
== 6.0
High August 15, 2011 8/15/11
== 5.0
== 7.0
== 6.0
High August 15, 2011 8/15/11
== 5.0
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low August 3, 2011 8/3/11
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium August 3, 2011 8/3/11
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium August 3, 2011 8/3/11
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium July 29, 2011 7/29/11
== 5.0
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low July 29, 2011 7/29/11
== 5.0
== 7.0
== 6.0
High July 28, 2011 7/28/11
== 5.0
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium July 17, 2011 7/17/11
== 5.0
== 6.0
High July 17, 2011 7/17/11
== 5.0
== 6.0
Medium July 17, 2011 7/17/11
== 5.0
== 6.0
High July 17, 2011 7/17/11
== 5.0
== 6.0
Medium July 11, 2011 7/11/11
== 5.0
== 6.0
Low July 7, 2011 7/7/11
== 5.0
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium June 6, 2011 6/6/11
== 5.0
== 6.0
Low June 6, 2011 6/6/11
== 5.0
== 6.0
Medium May 16, 2011 5/16/11
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low May 16, 2011 5/16/11
== 5.0
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium May 3, 2011 5/3/11
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium May 3, 2011 5/3/11
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low April 29, 2011 4/29/11
== 6.0
High April 8, 2011 4/8/11
== 5.0
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low March 29, 2011 3/29/11
== 5.0
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium March 25, 2011 3/25/11
*
High March 25, 2011 3/25/11
== 7.0
== 6.0
High March 25, 2011 3/25/11
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low March 2, 2011 3/2/11
== 5.0
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium February 22, 2011 2/22/11
== 5.0
== 7.0
== 6.0
High February 10, 2011 2/10/11
== 7.0
== 6.0
High February 10, 2011 2/10/11
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium February 10, 2011 2/10/11
== 7.0
== 6.0
High February 10, 2011 2/10/11
== 7.0
== 6.0
Medium February 4, 2011 2/4/11
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low February 4, 2011 2/4/11
== 7.0
== 6.0
High January 28, 2011 1/28/11
== 5.0
== 6.0
High January 28, 2011 1/28/11
== 5.0
== 6.0
High January 28, 2011 1/28/11
== 5.0
== 6.0
High January 28, 2011 1/28/11
== 5.0
== 6.0
High January 28, 2011 1/28/11
== 5.0
== 6.0
Medium January 28, 2011 1/28/11
== 5.0
== 6.0
High January 28, 2011 1/28/11
== 5.0
== 6.0
Medium January 20, 2011 1/20/11
== 6.0
High January 14, 2011 1/14/11
== 6.0
Low January 14, 2011 1/14/11
== 7.0
== 6.0
High January 14, 2011 1/14/11
== 7.0
== 6.0
Low January 3, 2011 1/3/11
== 5.0
Low January 3, 2011 1/3/11
== 5.0

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.