Vulnerability Database

356,159

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "debian_linux"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/debian_linux/1.2.3

debian / debian_linux

15498 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Low March 27, 2008 3/27/08
== 4.0
Critical March 19, 2008 3/19/08
== 3.1
== 4.0
High March 19, 2008 3/19/08
== 3.1
== 4.0
High March 17, 2008 3/17/08
== 4.0
High January 25, 2008 1/25/08
== 3.1
== 4.0
High January 18, 2008 1/18/08
== 3.1
== 4.0
Medium January 12, 2008 1/12/08
== 3.1
== 4.0
High January 10, 2008 1/10/08
== 5.0
Low January 9, 2008 1/9/08
== 3.1
High January 9, 2008 1/9/08
== 3.1
== 4.0
Low January 4, 2008 1/4/08
== 3.1
== 4.0
High December 20, 2007 12/20/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
Low December 18, 2007 12/18/07
*
Low December 4, 2007 12/4/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
Medium November 30, 2007 11/30/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
High October 30, 2007 10/30/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
High October 30, 2007 10/30/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
High October 30, 2007 10/30/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
High October 11, 2007 10/11/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
High October 4, 2007 10/4/07
== 3.1
High September 18, 2007 9/18/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
High September 5, 2007 9/5/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
High September 4, 2007 9/4/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
Medium September 4, 2007 9/4/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
Medium July 30, 2007 7/30/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
Critical July 16, 2007 7/16/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
High June 26, 2007 6/26/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
High June 26, 2007 6/26/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
High June 26, 2007 6/26/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
High June 26, 2007 6/26/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
High June 21, 2007 6/21/07
== 4.0
Medium June 19, 2007 6/19/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
Low June 11, 2007 6/11/07
== 3.1
Low May 16, 2007 5/16/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
High May 14, 2007 5/14/07
== 5.0
== 4.0
Low May 14, 2007 5/14/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
Low May 10, 2007 5/10/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
High May 9, 2007 5/9/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
High May 2, 2007 5/2/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
Low May 2, 2007 5/2/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
Low May 2, 2007 5/2/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
Medium April 24, 2007 4/24/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
Low April 22, 2007 4/22/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
Low April 10, 2007 4/10/07
== 3.1
== 3.1-r1
High April 6, 2007 4/6/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
High April 6, 2007 4/6/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
High April 6, 2007 4/6/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
High April 6, 2007 4/6/07
== 4.0
High March 24, 2007 3/24/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
Medium March 6, 2007 3/6/07
== 3.1

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.