Vulnerability Database

356,159

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "debian_linux"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/debian_linux/1.2.3

debian / debian_linux

15498 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Medium February 26, 2007 2/26/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
Medium February 26, 2007 2/26/07
== 3.1
High February 16, 2007 2/16/07
== 3.1
High February 6, 2007 2/6/07
== 3.1
== 3.0
Medium January 19, 2007 1/19/07
== 3.1
== 4.0
Low December 20, 2006 12/20/06
== 3.1
== 4.0
Medium December 20, 2006 12/20/06
== 3.1
== 4.0
Medium December 20, 2006 12/20/06
== 3.1
== 4.0
Medium December 20, 2006 12/20/06
== 3.1
== 4.0
Low December 18, 2006 12/18/06
== 3.1
High December 12, 2006 12/12/06
== 3.1
High November 22, 2006 11/22/06
== 3.1
== 4.0
High October 10, 2006 10/10/06
== 3.1
Low September 28, 2006 9/28/06
== 3.1
High September 27, 2006 9/27/06
== 3.1
High August 31, 2006 8/31/06
== 3.1
Low August 21, 2006 8/21/06
== 3.1
High July 28, 2006 7/28/06
== 3.1
Low July 28, 2006 7/28/06
== 3.1
Low July 5, 2006 7/5/06
== 3.1
Medium May 30, 2006 5/30/06
== 3.1
== 3.0
Low April 25, 2006 4/25/06
== 3.1
== 3.0
Low April 18, 2006 4/18/06
== 3.1
== 3.1-r1
High April 14, 2006 4/14/06
== 3.1
High April 14, 2006 4/14/06
== 3.1
High April 14, 2006 4/14/06
== 3.1
High April 13, 2006 4/13/06
== 3.1
Low March 31, 2006 3/31/06
== 3.1
Low March 31, 2006 3/31/06
== 3.1
Low March 31, 2006 3/31/06
== 3.1
Low March 24, 2006 3/24/06
== 3.1-r1
Low March 23, 2006 3/23/06
== 3.1
== 3.0
High March 15, 2006 3/15/06
== 3.1
Medium February 18, 2006 2/18/06
== 3.1
== 3.0
Medium December 31, 2005 12/31/05
== 3.1
== 3.0
High December 31, 2005 12/31/05
== 3.1
== 3.0
Medium December 31, 2005 12/31/05
== 3.1
== 3.0
Medium December 31, 2005 12/31/05
== 3.1
== 3.0
Medium December 12, 2005 12/12/05
== 3.1
== 3.0
High November 30, 2005 11/30/05
== 3.1
Medium November 27, 2005 11/27/05
== 3.1
High October 27, 2005 10/27/05
== 3.1
== 3.0
High October 24, 2005 10/24/05
== 3.1
Low October 21, 2005 10/21/05
== 3.1
Critical October 17, 2005 10/17/05
== 3.1
== 3.0
Low October 12, 2005 10/12/05
== 3.1
Low October 5, 2005 10/5/05
== 3.1
Low September 30, 2005 9/30/05
== 3.1
Low September 28, 2005 9/28/05
== 3.1
Low September 26, 2005 9/26/05
== 3.1

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.