Vulnerability Database

328,409

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "enterprise_linux_for_arm_64_eus"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/enterprise_linux_for_arm_64_eus/1.2.3

redhat / enterprise_linux_for_arm_64_eus

36 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Critical February 6, 2026 2/6/26
== 10.0_aarch64
High November 26, 2025 11/26/25
== 10.0
High June 12, 2025 6/12/25
== 9.4_aarch64
== 9.6_aarch64
== 10.0_aarch64
High April 3, 2025 4/3/25
== 9.4_aarch64
== 9.6_aarch64
High April 3, 2025 4/3/25
== 9.2_aarch64
== 9.6_aarch64
== 9.4_aarch64
== 8.8_aarch64
== 10.0_aarch64
High February 27, 2025 2/27/25
== 9.4_aarch64
Medium January 14, 2025 1/14/25
== 9.6_aarch64
Medium January 14, 2025 1/14/25
== 9.6_aarch64
High January 14, 2025 1/14/25
== 9.4_aarch64
== 8.8_aarch64
== 9.6_aarch64
Medium October 15, 2024 10/15/24
== 9.4_aarch64
High October 9, 2024 10/9/24
== 9.2_aarch64
== 8.8_aarch64
== 9.4_aarch64
== 9.0_aarch64
High July 1, 2024 7/1/24
== 9.4_aarch64
High April 18, 2024 4/18/24
== 9.2_aarch64
== 8.6_aarch64
== 8.8_aarch64
== 9.0_aarch64
== 9.4_aarch64
== 9.6_aarch64
Medium April 16, 2024 4/16/24
== 9.4_aarch64
Medium April 16, 2024 4/16/24
== 9.4_aarch64
Medium April 16, 2024 4/16/24
== 9.4_aarch64
Medium April 16, 2024 4/16/24
== 9.4_aarch64
Medium April 16, 2024 4/16/24
== 9.4_aarch64
High February 15, 2024 2/15/24
== 8.6_aarch64
== 8.8_aarch64
== 9.4_aarch64
Medium February 12, 2024 2/12/24
== 9.2
== 8.6
== 8.8
Medium February 7, 2024 2/7/24
== 9.2_aarch64
== 8.6_aarch64
Medium February 7, 2024 2/7/24
== 9.2_aarch64
== 8.6_aarch64
Medium February 7, 2024 2/7/24
== 9.2_aarch64
== 8.6_aarch64
Medium January 31, 2024 1/31/24
== 9.4_aarch64
Medium January 10, 2024 1/10/24
== 9.2
== 8.8
== 9.0
High November 1, 2023 11/1/23
== 9.2
== 8.6
== 8.8
== 9.0
High October 23, 2023 10/23/23
== 9.2_aarch64
== 8.8_aarch64
== 9.4_aarch64
High October 3, 2023 10/3/23
== 8.6_aarch64
== 9.2_aarch64
== 9.4_aarch64
== 9.6_aarch64
High September 27, 2023 9/27/23
== 8.8_aarch64
Medium September 18, 2023 9/18/23
== 9.2_aarch64
Medium September 18, 2023 9/18/23
== 9.2_aarch64
High August 23, 2023 8/23/23
== 9.2
== 8.6
== 8.8
== 9.0
Critical September 16, 2021 9/16/21
== 8.8
== 8.6
Medium November 1, 2019 11/1/19
== 8.8_aarch64
== 8.6_aarch64
== 8.4_aarch64
== 8.2_aarch64
== 8.1_aarch64
High October 28, 2019 10/28/19
== 8.6_aarch64
== 8.8_aarch64
== 8.4_aarch64
== 8.2_aarch64
== 8.1_aarch64
High April 8, 2019 4/8/19
== 8.6_aarch64
== 8.8_aarch64
== 8.4_aarch64
== 8.2_aarch64
== 8.1_aarch64

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.