Vulnerability Database

328,411

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2023-5455

A Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in ipa/session/login_password in all supported versions of IPA. This flaw allows an attacker to trick the user into submitting a request that could perform actions as the user, resulting in a loss of confidentiality and system integrity. During community penetration testing it was found that for certain HTTP end-points FreeIPA does not ensure CSRF protection. Due to implementation details one cannot use this flaw for reflection of a cookie representing already logged-in user. An attacker would always have to go through a new authentication attempt.

  • Published: Jan 10, 2024
  • Updated: Nov 16, 2025
  • CVE: CVE-2023-5455
  • Severity: Medium
  • Exploit:

CVSS v3:

  • Severity: Medium
  • Score: 6.5
  • AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

CWEs:

Software From Fixed in
freeipa / freeipa - 4.6.10
freeipa / freeipa 4.11.0-beta1 4.11.0-beta1.x
freeipa / freeipa 4.11.0 4.11.0.x
freeipa / freeipa 4.10.0 4.10.3
freeipa / freeipa 4.7.0 4.9.14
fedoraproject / fedora 38 38.x
fedoraproject / fedora 39 39.x
fedoraproject / fedora 40 40.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_desktop 7.0 7.0.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_workstation 7.0 7.0.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_for_scientific_computing 7.0 7.0.x
redhat / enterprise_linux 7.0 7.0.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_for_power_little_endian 7.0 7.0.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_for_power_big_endian 7.0 7.0.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_for_ibm_z_systems 7.0 7.0.x
redhat / enterprise_linux 8.0 8.0.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_server_tus 8.2 8.2.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_server_aus 8.2 8.2.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_server_tus 8.4 8.4.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_server_aus 8.4 8.4.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_server_update_services_for_sap_solutions 8.2 8.2.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_for_power_little_endian 8.0 8.0.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_for_ibm_z_systems 8.0 8.0.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_server_for_power_little_endian_update_services_for_sap_solutions 8.2 8.2.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_server_for_power_little_endian_update_services_for_sap_solutions 8.4 8.4.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_server_for_power_little_endian_update_services_for_sap_solutions 8.6 8.6.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_server_update_services_for_sap_solutions 8.6 8.6.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_for_ibm_z_systems_eus 8.6 8.6.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_server_aus 8.6 8.6.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_server_tus 8.6 8.6.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_eus 8.6 8.6.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_for_power_little_endian_eus 8.6 8.6.x
redhat / enterprise_linux 9.0 9.0.x
redhat / enterprise_linux 8.4 8.4.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_for_power_little_endian_eus 9.0 9.0.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_for_power_little_endian 9.0 9.0.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_eus 9.0 9.0.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_server_update_services_for_sap_solutions 9.0 9.0.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_for_ibm_z_systems 9.0 9.0.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_for_ibm_z_systems_eus 9.0 9.0.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_eus 8.8 8.8.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_server_aus 9.2 9.2.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_eus 9.2 9.2.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_for_ibm_z_systems_eus 9.2 9.2.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_for_power_little_endian_eus 9.2 9.2.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_for_arm_64_eus 9.2 9.2.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_server_update_services_for_sap_solutions 9.2 9.2.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_for_arm_64_eus 8.8 8.8.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_for_arm_64_eus 9.0 9.0.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_for_ibm_z_systems_eus 8.8 8.8.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_for_power_little_endian_eus 8.8 8.8.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_server 9.2 9.2.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_update_services_for_sap_solutions 9.2 9.2.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_update_services_for_sap_solutions 9.0 9.0.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_server 9.0 9.0.x
redhat / enterprise_linux_server_for_ibm_z_systems 9.2 9.2.x

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.