Vulnerability Database

328,409

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "kaspersky_anti--virus"

Found 2 matching products. Filters apply to all results.

You can search for specific versions with /product/kaspersky_anti--virus/1.2.3

kaspersky / kaspersky_anti-virus

16 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Low March 21, 2012 3/21/12
== 7.0.0.125
Low March 21, 2012 3/21/12
== 7.0.0.125
Low March 21, 2012 3/21/12
== 7.0.0.125
Low March 21, 2012 3/21/12
== 7.0.0.125
Low March 21, 2012 3/21/12
== 7.0.0.125
Low March 21, 2012 3/21/12
== 7.0.0.125
Low March 21, 2012 3/21/12
== 7.0.0.125
Low March 21, 2012 3/21/12
== 7.0.0.125
Low March 21, 2012 3/21/12
== 7.0.0.125
Low March 21, 2012 3/21/12
== 7.0.0.125
Low March 21, 2012 3/21/12
== 7.0.0.125
Low November 30, 2009 11/30/09
== 9.0.0.463
Low August 25, 2009 8/25/09
== 9.0.0.463
Medium July 30, 2009 7/30/09
== 2010
Medium June 19, 2006 6/19/06
== 7.0
== 6.0
High October 18, 2001 10/18/01
== 3.5.132.2

kaspersky_lab / kaspersky_anti-virus

28 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Medium December 29, 2009 12/29/09
== 5.0.712
== 7.0.1.325
== 6.0.3.837
High February 10, 2009 2/10/09
== 2008
== 6.0
High June 5, 2008 6/5/08
== 6.0
== 7.0
Low September 26, 2007 9/26/07
*
High April 6, 2007 4/6/07
== 6.0
High April 6, 2007 4/6/07
== 6.0
High April 6, 2007 4/6/07
== 6.0
Medium April 6, 2007 4/6/07
== 6.0
<= 6.0
Medium April 6, 2007 4/6/07
== 6.0
<= 6.0
Medium December 10, 2006 12/10/06
== 5.5.10
High October 20, 2006 10/20/06
== 5.0
== 6.0
High March 9, 2006 3/9/06
== 5.5.3
== 5.0.5
High November 18, 2005 11/18/05
== 5.0
High November 18, 2005 11/18/05
== 5.0.5
Medium October 30, 2005 10/30/05
== 5.0.372
Medium October 14, 2005 10/14/05
*
High October 5, 2005 10/5/05
== 5.0
Low August 16, 2005 8/16/05
== 5.0.5
High June 9, 2005 6/9/05
== 5.0.228
== 5.0.227
== 5.0.335
High February 9, 2005 2/9/05
== 4.0
== 5.0
== 3.0
High January 27, 2005 1/27/05
== 4.0
== 5.0
== 3.0
High January 27, 2005 1/27/05
== 4.0
== 5.0
== 3.0
High January 27, 2005 1/27/05
== 4.0
== 5.0
== 3.0
High January 27, 2005 1/27/05
== 4.0
== 5.0
== 3.0
High January 27, 2005 1/27/05
== 4.0
== 5.0
== 3.0
High January 10, 2005 1/10/05
== 4.0
== 5.0
== 3.0
Low December 31, 2003 12/31/03
== 4.0.9.0
Low December 31, 2003 12/31/03
== 4.0.9.0

Showing vulnerabilities for 2 products matching "kaspersky_anti--virus". Each product has independent pagination.

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.