Vulnerability Database

325,773

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2012-1457

The TAR file parser in Avira AntiVir 7.11.1.163, Antiy Labs AVL SDK 2.0.3.7, avast! Antivirus 4.8.1351.0 and 5.0.677.0, AVG Anti-Virus 10.0.0.1190, Bitdefender 7.2, Quick Heal (aka Cat QuickHeal) 11.00, ClamAV 0.96.4, Command Antivirus 5.2.11.5, Emsisoft Anti-Malware 5.1.0.1, eSafe 7.0.17.0, F-Prot Antivirus 4.6.2.117, G Data AntiVirus 21, Ikarus Virus Utilities T3 Command Line Scanner 1.1.97.0, Jiangmin Antivirus 13.0.900, K7 AntiVirus 9.77.3565, Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0.0.125, McAfee Anti-Virus Scanning Engine 5.400.0.1158, McAfee Gateway (formerly Webwasher) 2010.1C, Antimalware Engine 1.1.6402.0 in Microsoft Security Essentials 2.0, NOD32 Antivirus 5795, Norman Antivirus 6.06.12, PC Tools AntiVirus 7.0.3.5, Rising Antivirus 22.83.00.03, AVEngine 20101.3.0.103 in Symantec Endpoint Protection 11, Trend Micro AntiVirus 9.120.0.1004, Trend Micro HouseCall 9.120.0.1004, VBA32 3.12.14.2, and VirusBuster 13.6.151.0 allows remote attackers to bypass malware detection via a TAR archive entry with a length field that exceeds the total TAR file size. NOTE: this may later be SPLIT into multiple CVEs if additional information is published showing that the error occurred independently in different TAR parser implementations.

  • Published: Mar 21, 2012
  • Updated: Nov 9, 2025
  • CVE: CVE-2012-1457
  • Severity: Low
  • Exploit:

CVSS v2:

  • Severity: Low
  • Score: 4.3
  • AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N

CWEs:

Software From Fixed in
bitdefender / bitdefender 7.2 7.2.x
alwil / avast_antivirus 4.8.1351.0 4.8.1351.0.x
norman / norman_antivirus_&_antispyware 6.06.12 6.06.12.x
clamav / clamav 0.96.4 0.96.4.x
rising-global / rising_antivirus 22.83.00.03 22.83.00.03.x
anti-virus / vba32 3.12.14.2 3.12.14.2.x
eset / nod32_antivirus 5795 5795.x
trendmicro / housecall 9.120.0.1004 9.120.0.1004.x
avira / antivir 7.11.1.163 7.11.1.163.x
symantec / endpoint_protection 11.0 11.0.x
trendmicro / trend_micro_antivirus 9.120.0.1004 9.120.0.1004.x
f-prot / f-prot_antivirus 4.6.2.117 4.6.2.117.x
alwil / avast_antivirus 5.0.677.0 5.0.677.0.x
mcafee / gateway 2010.1c 2010.1c.x
kaspersky / kaspersky_anti-virus 7.0.0.125 7.0.0.125.x
cat / quick_heal 11.00 11.00.x
avg / avg_anti-virus 10.0.0.1190 10.0.0.1190.x
gdata-software / g_data_antivirus 21 21.x
k7computing / antivirus 9.77.3565 9.77.3565.x
jiangmin / jiangmin_antivirus 13.0.900 13.0.900.x
authentium / command_antivirus 5.2.11.5 5.2.11.5.x
ikarus / ikarus_virus_utilities_t3_command_line_scanner 1.1.97.0 1.1.97.0.x
virusbuster / virusbuster 13.6.151.0 13.6.151.0.x
antiy / avl_sdk 2.0.3.7 2.0.3.7.x
microsoft / security_essentials 2.0 2.0.x
emsisoft / anti-malware 5.1.0.1 5.1.0.1.x
pc_tools / pc_tools_antivirus 7.0.3.5 7.0.3.5.x
aladdin / esafe 7.0.17.0 7.0.17.0.x
mcafee / scan_engine 5.400.0.1158 5.400.0.1158.x

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.