Vulnerability Database

326,895

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "postnuke"

Found 2 matching products. Filters apply to all results.

You can search for specific versions with /product/postnuke/1.2.3

postnuke_software_foundation / postnuke

38 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Medium January 19, 2007 1/19/07
== 0.764
High January 19, 2007 1/19/07
== 0.764
High January 19, 2007 1/19/07
== 0.764
High December 4, 2006 12/4/06
== 0.7.5.0
High December 2, 2006 12/2/06
== 0.761
== 0.760_rc4
== 0.760_rc3
== 0.760_rc2
== 0.762
== 0.763
== 0.76_rc4b
== 0.76_rc4
== 0.761a
== 0.76_rc4a
High November 6, 2006 11/6/06
== 0.762
<= 0.763
High October 3, 2006 10/3/06
== 0.762
Low February 20, 2006 2/20/06
== 0.71
== 0.761
== 0.63
== 0.64
== 0.703
== 0.76_rc4b
== 0.726.3
== 0.76_rc4
== 0.721
== 0.75_rc3
== 0.761a
== 0.73
== 0.74
== 0.75
== 0.76_rc4a
== 0.72
== 0.70
== 0.62
== 0.7
Medium February 20, 2006 2/20/06
<= 0.761
Low February 20, 2006 2/20/06
<= 0.761
High January 9, 2006 1/9/06
== 0.761
High January 9, 2006 1/9/06
== 0.761
Low August 24, 2005 8/24/05
== 0.76_rc4b
High August 24, 2005 8/24/05
== 0.76_rc4b
High May 31, 2005 5/31/05
== 0.750
Low May 31, 2005 5/31/05
== 0.750
High May 24, 2005 5/24/05
== 0.750
Low May 24, 2005 5/24/05
== 0.760_rc3
== 0.760_rc2
== 0.750
Low May 24, 2005 5/24/05
== 0.760_rc3
== 0.750
Low May 24, 2005 5/24/05
== 0.760_rc3
High May 24, 2005 5/24/05
== 0.760_rc3
Medium May 16, 2005 5/16/05
== 0.760_rc4
== 0.760_rc3
== 0.760_rc2
== 0.750
High May 2, 2005 5/2/05
== 0.760_rc2
High May 2, 2005 5/2/05
== 0.760_rc2
== 0.750
High May 2, 2005 5/2/05
== 0.760_rc3
Low May 2, 2005 5/2/05
== 0.760_rc3
Medium May 2, 2005 5/2/05
== 0.760_rc3
High December 31, 2004 12/31/04
== 0.726
Medium December 31, 2004 12/31/04
== 0.726
== 0.722
== 0.723
Low December 31, 2004 12/31/04
== 0.726
Medium April 21, 2004 4/21/04
== 0.726
Medium December 31, 2003 12/31/03
<= 0.723
Low December 31, 2002 12/31/02
== 0.71
== 0.63
== 0.64
== 0.703
== 0.70
== 0.62
== 0.7
High December 31, 2002 12/31/02
== 0.703
Medium July 3, 2002 7/3/02
== 0.71
== 0.64
== 0.703
== 0.70
Low December 31, 2001 12/31/01
== 0.63
== 0.64
== 0.62
High November 21, 2001 11/21/01
== 0.64
High October 13, 2001 10/13/01
== 0.63
== 0.64
== 0.62

postnuke / postnuke

4 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
High May 4, 2010 5/4/10
== 0.764
High March 31, 2008 3/31/08
<= 0.764
Medium May 24, 2005 5/24/05
== 0.750
== 0.760-rc3
== 0.760-rc2
Medium May 24, 2005 5/24/05
== 0.750
== 0.760-rc3

Showing vulnerabilities for 2 products matching "postnuke". Each product has independent pagination.

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.