Vulnerability Database

346,508

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "qemu"

Found 2 matching products. Filters apply to all results.

You can search for specific versions with /product/qemu/1.2.3

qemu / qemu

2821 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Low August 27, 2020 8/27/20
< 5.0.0
Low August 11, 2020 8/11/20
<= 5.0.0
Medium July 28, 2020 7/28/20
<= 5.0.0
== 5.1.0-rc0
Low July 21, 2020 7/21/20
== 4.2.0
Low July 2, 2020 7/2/20
<= 5.0.1
Medium June 9, 2020 6/9/20
< 5.0.1
Medium June 4, 2020 6/4/20
>= 4.0.0 < 5.0.0
Medium June 4, 2020 6/4/20
== 4.0.0
== 4.1.0
Medium June 4, 2020 6/4/20
<= 5.0.1
Medium June 4, 2020 6/4/20
== 4.2.0
Medium June 2, 2020 6/2/20
<= 5.0.1
Low June 2, 2020 6/2/20
== 4.2.0
Low May 28, 2020 5/28/20
<= 5.0.0
Low May 28, 2020 5/28/20
<= 5.0.0
Medium May 27, 2020 5/27/20
<= 5.0.1
Low May 4, 2020 5/4/20
>= 5.0 < 5.0.1
Low April 27, 2020 4/27/20
>= 4.0.1 <= 4.2.0
Medium April 6, 2020 4/6/20
== 4.2.0
Medium March 10, 2020 3/10/20
== 4.0.0
Low March 5, 2020 3/5/20
== 4.1.0
High February 11, 2020 2/11/20
>= 2.12.0 < 4.2.1
High February 11, 2020 2/11/20
< 1.7.2
Low January 31, 2020 1/31/20
< 2.4.0.1
Medium January 23, 2020 1/23/20
< 2.4.0
Medium January 23, 2020 1/23/20
< 2.1.0
Medium January 23, 2020 1/23/20
< 2.4.0.1
High January 21, 2020 1/21/20
== 4.2.0
Medium January 16, 2020 1/16/20
== 4.2.0
High January 2, 2020 1/2/20
>= 1.1.2\+dfsg <= 2.1\+dfsg
High December 31, 2019 12/31/19
>= 2.4.0 <= 4.2.0
High December 30, 2019 12/30/19
== 1.5.0-rc1
>= 1.3.0 <= 1.4.2
Low September 24, 2019 9/24/19
== 1-4.1-1
== 1-2.1+dfsg-12+deb8u6
== 1-2.8+dfsg-6+deb9u8
== 1-3.1+dfsg-8+deb10u2
== 1-3.1+dfsg-8~deb10u1
High September 6, 2019 9/6/19
== 4.1.0
High July 3, 2019 7/3/19
== 3.1
== 4.0.0
High June 24, 2019 6/24/19
<= 4.0.0
High June 24, 2019 6/24/19
<= 4.0.0
Low June 3, 2019 6/3/19
== 3.0.0
High May 31, 2019 5/31/19
== 3.1.0
Medium May 24, 2019 5/24/19
== 4.0.0
Medium May 22, 2019 5/22/19
== 3.0.0
Medium April 19, 2019 4/19/19
== 3.1.50
Low March 21, 2019 3/21/19
<= 3.1.0
Low March 21, 2019 3/21/19
== 3.0.0
Low March 21, 2019 3/21/19
== 3.1
Low March 21, 2019 3/21/19
== 3.0.0
Low February 19, 2019 2/19/19
>= 2.10.0 <= 3.1.0
Medium December 20, 2018 12/20/18
<= 3.1.0
High December 20, 2018 12/20/18
<= 3.1.0
High December 20, 2018 12/20/18
<= 3.1.0
High December 20, 2018 12/20/18
<= 3.1.0

Showing vulnerabilities for 2 products matching "qemu". Each product has independent pagination.

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.