Vulnerability Database

346,508

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "qemu"

Found 2 matching products. Filters apply to all results.

You can search for specific versions with /product/qemu/1.2.3

qemu / qemu

2821 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
High August 2, 2017 8/2/17
<= 2.9.1
Medium August 2, 2017 8/2/17
<= 2.9.1
Low August 2, 2017 8/2/17
<= 2.9.1
Medium July 25, 2017 7/25/17
<= 2.9.1
== 2.10.0-rc0
== 2.10.0-rc1
== 2.10.0-rc2
== 2.10.0-rc3
Low July 25, 2017 7/25/17
<= 2.8
High July 6, 2017 7/6/17
<= 2.9.1
Medium June 16, 2017 6/16/17
<= 2.8.1.1
== 2.9.0-rc0
Medium June 16, 2017 6/16/17
<= 2.8.1.1
Medium June 16, 2017 6/16/17
<= 2.8.1.1
Medium June 16, 2017 6/16/17
<= 2.9.1
Medium June 8, 2017 6/8/17
<= 2.8.1.1
Medium June 8, 2017 6/8/17
<= 2.8.1.1
Medium June 1, 2017 6/1/17
<= 2.8.1.1
High May 23, 2017 5/23/17
<= 2.9.1
Medium May 23, 2017 5/23/17
<= 2.9.1
High May 17, 2017 5/17/17
<= 2.9.1
Medium May 2, 2017 5/2/17
== 2.9.0-rc1
== 2.9.0-rc2
== 2.9.0-rc3
== 2.9.0-rc0
<= 2.8.1
Medium May 2, 2017 5/2/17
<= 2.9.1
Medium April 26, 2017 4/26/17
<= 2.8.1.1
Medium April 20, 2017 4/20/17
<= 2.8.1.1
== 2.9.0-rc0
Medium April 13, 2017 4/13/17
<= 2.4.1
== 2.5.0-rc1
== 2.5.0-rc2
== 2.5.0-rc0
High April 13, 2017 4/13/17
<= 2.5.1.1
High April 13, 2017 4/13/17
<= 2.5.1.1
Medium April 11, 2017 4/11/17
<= 2.4.1
== 2.5.0-rc1
== 2.5.0-rc2
== 2.5.0-rc0
Medium April 11, 2017 4/11/17
<= 2.5.1
Medium April 11, 2017 4/11/17
<= 2.5.1
High April 11, 2017 4/11/17
<= 2.4.1
== 2.5.0-rc0
Medium April 10, 2017 4/10/17
== 2.9.0-rc1
== 2.9.0-rc0
<= 2.8.1
Medium March 27, 2017 3/27/17
<= 2.7.1
== 2.8.0-rc0
== 2.8.0-rc1
== 2.8.0-rc2
High March 27, 2017 3/27/17
<= 2.8.1.1
Medium March 27, 2017 3/27/17
<= 2.8.1.1
High March 24, 2017 3/24/17
<= 2.4.1
Medium March 20, 2017 3/20/17
<= 2.8.1.1
== 2.9.0-rc1
== 2.9.0-rc2
== 2.9.0-rc3
== 2.9.0-rc0
== 2.9.0-rc4
High March 20, 2017 3/20/17
<= 2.8.1.1
Medium March 16, 2017 3/16/17
<= 2.8.1.1
Medium March 16, 2017 3/16/17
<= 2.8.1.1
Medium March 16, 2017 3/16/17
<= 2.8.1.1
Medium March 15, 2017 3/15/17
<= 2.8.1.1
Medium March 15, 2017 3/15/17
<= 2.8.1.1
Medium March 15, 2017 3/15/17
<= 2.8.1.1
Medium March 15, 2017 3/15/17
<= 2.8.1.1
Medium March 15, 2017 3/15/17
<= 2.8.1.1
Medium March 15, 2017 3/15/17
<= 2.8.1.1
Medium March 15, 2017 3/15/17
<= 2.8.1.1
== 2.9.0-rc1
== 2.9.0-rc2
== 2.9.0-rc3
== 2.9.0-rc0
== 2.9.0-rc4
== 2.9.0-rc5
Medium March 15, 2017 3/15/17
<= 2.8.1.1
Medium February 27, 2017 2/27/17
<= 2.8.1.1
Medium February 27, 2017 2/27/17
<= 2.6.2
High January 23, 2017 1/23/17
<= 2.7.1
== 2.8.0-rc0
Medium December 29, 2016 12/29/16
<= 2.5.1.1
High December 29, 2016 12/29/16
<= 2.5.1

Showing vulnerabilities for 2 products matching "qemu". Each product has independent pagination.

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.