Vulnerability Database

346,350

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "sharepoint_server"

Found 1 matching product.

You can search for specific versions with /product/sharepoint_server/1.2.3

microsoft / sharepoint_server

812 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Low May 9, 2018 5/9/18
== 2016
Low May 9, 2018 5/9/18
== 2016
Low May 9, 2018 5/9/18
== 2010-sp2
High May 9, 2018 5/9/18
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
== 2016
Low May 9, 2018 5/9/18
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
Low March 14, 2018 3/14/18
== 2010-sp2
High March 14, 2018 3/14/18
== 2010-sp2
Low February 15, 2018 2/15/18
== 2013-sp1
== 2016
High January 10, 2018 1/10/18
== 2010-sp2
High January 10, 2018 1/10/18
== 2016
High January 10, 2018 1/10/18
== 2010-sp2
High October 13, 2017 10/13/17
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
High September 13, 2017 9/13/17
== 2016
High September 13, 2017 9/13/17
== 2016
Low September 13, 2017 9/13/17
== 2013-sp1
Low August 8, 2017 8/8/17
== 2010-sp2
Medium July 11, 2017 7/11/17
== 2016
High July 11, 2017 7/11/17
== 2013
== 2010-sp2
High June 15, 2017 6/15/17
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
== 2016
High June 15, 2017 6/15/17
== 2013-sp1
== 2016
High June 15, 2017 6/15/17
== 2007-sp3
High May 12, 2017 5/12/17
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
== 2016
High May 12, 2017 5/12/17
== 2013-sp1
== 2016
Low April 12, 2017 4/12/17
== 2010-sp2
== 2010-sp1
Low March 17, 2017 3/17/17
== 2010-sp2
High March 17, 2017 3/17/17
== 2007-sp3
High March 17, 2017 3/17/17
== 2007-sp3
Low March 17, 2017 3/17/17
== 2013-sp1
High March 17, 2017 3/17/17
== 2010-sp2
Medium December 20, 2016 12/20/16
== 2010-sp2
Medium December 20, 2016 12/20/16
== 2010-sp2
Medium December 20, 2016 12/20/16
== 2007-sp3
== 2010-sp2
Medium December 20, 2016 12/20/16
== 2010-sp2
High November 10, 2016 11/10/16
== 2010-sp2
High November 10, 2016 11/10/16
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
Low November 10, 2016 11/10/16
== 2013-sp1
High July 13, 2016 7/13/16
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
== 2016
High July 13, 2016 7/13/16
== 2010-sp2
Low July 13, 2016 7/13/16
== 2010-sp2
Low June 16, 2016 6/16/16
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
High June 16, 2016 6/16/16
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
High May 11, 2016 5/11/16
== 2010-sp2
High May 11, 2016 5/11/16
== 2010-sp2
High April 12, 2016 4/12/16
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
High March 9, 2016 3/9/16
== 2010-sp2
== 2013-sp1
High February 10, 2016 2/10/16
== 2013-sp1
High February 10, 2016 2/10/16
== 2013-sp1
High February 10, 2016 2/10/16
== 2013-sp1
High February 10, 2016 2/10/16
== 2013-sp1
Low January 13, 2016 1/13/16
== 2013-sp1

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.