Vulnerability Database

346,508

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "windows_nt"

Found 2 matching products. Filters apply to all results.

You can search for specific versions with /product/windows_nt/1.2.3

microsoft / windows_nt

788 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected Version
Low August 3, 2001 8/3/01
== 4.0
== 4.0-sp2
== 4.0-sp1
== 4.0-sp4
== 4.0-sp6a
== 4.0-sp6
== 4.0-sp3
== 4.0-sp5
Low July 27, 2001 7/27/01
== 4.0-sp5
== 4.0-sp6a
== 4.0-sp2
== 4.0-sp4
== 4.0-sp6
== 4.0-sp3
== 4.0-sp1
== 4.0
High July 21, 2001 7/21/01
== 4.0-sp5
== 4.0-sp3
== 4.0-sp6a
== 4.0-sp6
== 4.0
== 4.0-sp1
== 4.0-sp4
== 4.0-sp2
Medium July 7, 2001 7/7/01
== 4.0
== 4.0-sp2
== 4.0-sp1
== 4.0-sp4
== 4.0-sp6a
== 4.0-sp6
== 4.0-sp3
== 4.0-sp5
High July 2, 2001 7/2/01
== 4.0
Low June 18, 2001 6/18/01
== 4.0
High May 3, 2001 5/3/01
*
High March 12, 2001 3/12/01
<= 4.0
Medium March 12, 2001 3/12/01
<= 4.0
High February 16, 2001 2/16/01
== 4.0
== terminal_server
Low February 16, 2001 2/16/01
== 4.0
High February 16, 2001 2/16/01
== 4.0
== terminal_server
Medium February 12, 2001 2/12/01
*
High February 12, 2001 2/12/01
== 4.0
Medium January 9, 2001 1/9/01
== 4.0
High January 9, 2001 1/9/01
== 4.0
High January 9, 2001 1/9/01
== terminal_server
Medium December 31, 2000 12/31/00
== 4.0-sp5
== 4.0-sp3
== 4.0-sp6a
== 4.0-sp6
== 4.0
== 4.0-sp1
== 4.0-sp4
== 4.0-sp2
High December 19, 2000 12/19/00
== 4.0
== 4.0-sp1
Medium December 14, 2000 12/14/00
== 4.0
Medium November 14, 2000 11/14/00
== 4.0
High August 29, 2000 8/29/00
== 4.0
Medium July 27, 2000 7/27/00
== 4.0
== terminal_server
Low July 25, 2000 7/25/00
== 4.0
Low July 1, 2000 7/1/00
== 3.5.1
== 3.5.1-sp1
== 4.0
== 3.5.1-sp5
== 3.5.1-sp3
== 3.5.1-sp2
Medium June 8, 2000 6/8/00
== 4.0
Medium June 5, 2000 6/5/00
== 4.0
High June 1, 2000 6/1/00
== 3.5.1
== 3.5.1-sp1
== 4.0
== 3.5.1-sp5
== 3.5.1-sp3
== 3.5.1-sp2
Medium May 25, 2000 5/25/00
== 4.0
Medium May 25, 2000 5/25/00
== 4.0
High May 19, 2000 5/19/00
== 4.0
Medium May 16, 2000 5/16/00
== 4.0
== 4.0-sp1
Medium April 20, 2000 4/20/00
== 4.0
High April 19, 2000 4/19/00
== 4.0
Critical April 14, 2000 4/14/00
== 4.0
High April 12, 2000 4/12/00
== 4.0
High April 11, 2000 4/11/00
== 4.0
Low March 30, 2000 3/30/00
== 4.0
High February 18, 2000 2/18/00
== 4.0
Low February 14, 2000 2/14/00
== 4.0
Low February 4, 2000 2/4/00
== 4.0
== 4.0-sp1
Low February 4, 2000 2/4/00
== 4.0
Low February 1, 2000 2/1/00
== 4.0
== 4.0-sp2
== 4.0-sp1
== 4.0-sp4
== 4.0-sp6
== 4.0-sp3
== 4.0-sp5
Low January 20, 2000 1/20/00
== 3.5.1
== 4.0
High January 12, 2000 1/12/00
== 4.0
== 4.0-sp2
== 4.0-sp1
== 4.0-sp4
== 4.0-sp6
== 4.0-sp3
== 4.0-sp5
Medium December 31, 1999 12/31/99
<= 4.0
Low December 31, 1999 12/31/99
== 4.0
High December 31, 1999 12/31/99
== 4.0
Medium December 31, 1999 12/31/99
== 4.0
Medium December 31, 1999 12/31/99
<= 4.0

Showing vulnerabilities for 2 products matching "windows_nt". Each product has independent pagination.

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.