Vulnerability Database

393,392

Total vulnerabilities in the database

Vulnerabilities for products matching "windows_nt"

Found 2 matching products. Filters apply to all results.

You can search for specific versions with /product/windows_nt/1.2.3

microsoft / windows_nt

251 vulnerabilities found
Title Severity Exploit Date Affected versions
High January 1, 1999 1/1/99
All versions
High January 1, 1999 1/1/99
All versions
High January 1, 1999 1/1/99
All versions
High January 1, 1999 1/1/99
All versions
Medium January 1, 1999 1/1/99
All versions
High January 1, 1999 1/1/99
All versions
High January 1, 1999 1/1/99
All versions
Medium January 1, 1999 1/1/99
All versions
Medium October 5, 1998 10/5/98
= 4.0
High October 1, 1998 10/1/98
All versions
High October 1, 1998 10/1/98
All versions
Medium October 1, 1998 10/1/98
All versions
Medium September 29, 1998 9/29/98
= 4.0
= 4.0-sp1
= 4.0-sp2
= 4.0-sp3
Medium August 1, 1998 8/1/98
= 4.0
= 4.0-sp1
= 4.0-sp2
= 4.0-sp3
High August 1, 1998 8/1/98
= 3.5.1
= 4.0
Medium June 1, 1998 6/1/98
= 4.0
Medium May 9, 1998 5/9/98
= 3.5.1
= 4.0
Medium February 14, 1998 2/14/98
= 4.0
Medium February 13, 1998 2/13/98
All versions
High February 1, 1998 2/1/98
All versions
Medium December 23, 1997 12/23/97
= 4.0
= 4.0-sp1
= 4.0-sp2
= 4.0-sp3
Medium December 16, 1997 12/16/97
= 3.5.1
= 3.5.1-sp1
= 3.5.1-sp2
= 4.0
= 4.0-sp1
= 4.0-sp2
Medium December 16, 1997 12/16/97
= 4.0
= 4.0-sp1
= 4.0-sp2
Medium December 1, 1997 12/1/97
= 4.0
Medium July 25, 1997 7/25/97
All versions
Medium July 10, 1997 7/10/97
<= 4.0
Medium July 1, 1997 7/1/97
All versions
Medium July 1, 1997 7/1/97
All versions
Medium June 10, 1997 6/10/97
All versions
Medium June 1, 1997 6/1/97
= 4.0
Medium April 2, 1997 4/2/97
= 4.0-sp2
Medium April 1, 1997 4/1/97
= 4.0-sp1
= 4.0-sp2
Low March 1, 1997 3/1/97
All versions
Medium February 7, 1997 2/7/97
= 4.0
= 4.0-sp1
= 4.0-sp2
Medium January 1, 1997 1/1/97
= 3.5.1
High January 1, 1997 1/1/97
All versions
Medium January 1, 1997 1/1/97
= 4.0
= 4.0-sp1
= 4.0-sp2
High January 1, 1997 1/1/97
= 4.0
High January 1, 1997 1/1/97
All versions
High January 1, 1997 1/1/97
All versions
High January 1, 1997 1/1/97
All versions
Critical January 1, 1997 1/1/97
All versions
High January 1, 1997 1/1/97
All versions
Medium January 1, 1997 1/1/97
All versions
High January 1, 1997 1/1/97
All versions
High January 1, 1997 1/1/97
All versions
High January 1, 1997 1/1/97
All versions
High January 1, 1997 1/1/97
All versions
High January 1, 1997 1/1/97
All versions
Medium January 1, 1997 1/1/97
All versions

Showing vulnerabilities for 2 products matching "windows_nt". Each product has independent pagination.

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.