Vulnerability Database

328,409

Total vulnerabilities in the database

CVE-2009-2528

GDI+ in Microsoft Office XP SP3 does not properly handle malformed objects in Office Art Property Tables, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted Office document that triggers memory corruption, aka "Memory Corruption Vulnerability."

  • Published: Oct 14, 2009
  • Updated: Nov 9, 2025
  • CVE: CVE-2009-2528
  • Severity: High
  • Exploit:

CVSS v2:

  • Severity: High
  • Score: 9.3
  • AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:C/I:C/A:C

CWEs:

Software From Fixed in
microsoft / windows_2003_server - -
microsoft / windows_xp - -
microsoft / windows_vista - -
microsoft / windows_server_2008 - -
microsoft / .net_framework 1.1-sp1 1.1-sp1.x
microsoft / .net_framework 2.0-sp2 2.0-sp2.x
microsoft / .net_framework 2.0-sp1 2.0-sp1.x
microsoft / internet_explorer 6-sp1 6-sp1.x
microsoft / report_viewer 2008-sp1 2008-sp1.x
microsoft / sql_server_reporting_services 2000-sp2 2000-sp2.x
microsoft / sql_server 2005-sp2 2005-sp2.x
microsoft / sql_server 2005-sp3 2005-sp3.x
microsoft / report_viewer 2008 2008.x
microsoft / report_viewer 2005-sp1 2005-sp1.x
microsoft / expression_web - -
microsoft / project 2002-sp1 2002-sp1.x
microsoft / office_powerpoint_viewer 2007-sp1 2007-sp1.x
microsoft / office_excel_viewer - -
microsoft / office_word_viewer - -
microsoft / office_compatibility_pack 2007-sp2 2007-sp2.x
microsoft / office 2007-sp2 2007-sp2.x
microsoft / excel_viewer 2003 2003.x
microsoft / expression_web 2 2.x
microsoft / visio 2002-sp2 2002-sp2.x
microsoft / office_compatibility_pack 2007-sp1 2007-sp1.x
microsoft / excel_viewer 2003-sp3 2003-sp3.x
microsoft / office_powerpoint_viewer - -
microsoft / works 8.5 8.5.x
microsoft / word_viewer 2003 2003.x
microsoft / word_viewer 2003-sp3 2003-sp3.x
microsoft / office 2007-sp1 2007-sp1.x
microsoft / office_groove 2007 2007.x
microsoft / office_groove 2007-sp1 2007-sp1.x
microsoft / office 2003-sp3 2003-sp3.x
microsoft / office_powerpoint_viewer 2007-sp2 2007-sp2.x
microsoft / office xp xp.x
microsoft / visual_studio_.net 2003-sp1 2003-sp1.x
microsoft / visual_studio_.net 2005-sp1 2005-sp1.x
microsoft / visual_studio 2008-sp1 2008-sp1.x
microsoft / platform_sdk - -
microsoft / visual_studio 2008 2008.x
microsoft / forefront_client_security 1.0 1.0.x
microsoft / visual_foxpro 8.0-sp1 8.0-sp1.x
microsoft / visual_foxpro 9.0-sp2 9.0-sp2.x

Frequently Asked Questions

A security vulnerability is a weakness in software, hardware, or configuration that can be exploited to compromise confidentiality, integrity, or availability. Many vulnerabilities are tracked as CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures), which provide a standardized identifier so teams can coordinate patching, mitigation, and risk assessment across tools and vendors.

CVSS (Common Vulnerability Scoring System) estimates technical severity, but it doesn't automatically equal business risk. Prioritize using context like internet exposure, affected asset criticality, known exploitation (proof-of-concept or in-the-wild), and whether compensating controls exist. A "Medium" CVSS on an exposed, production system can be more urgent than a "Critical" on an isolated, non-production host.

A vulnerability is the underlying weakness. An exploit is the method or code used to take advantage of it. A zero-day is a vulnerability that is unknown to the vendor or has no publicly available fix when attackers begin using it. In practice, risk increases sharply when exploitation becomes reliable or widespread.

Recurring findings usually come from incomplete Asset Discovery, inconsistent patch management, inherited images, and configuration drift. In modern environments, you also need to watch the software supply chain: dependencies, containers, build pipelines, and third-party services can reintroduce the same weakness even after you patch a single host. Unknown or unmanaged assets (often called Shadow IT) are a common reason the same issues resurface.

Use a simple, repeatable triage model: focus first on externally exposed assets, high-value systems (identity, VPN, email, production), vulnerabilities with known exploits, and issues that enable remote code execution or privilege escalation. Then enforce patch SLAs and track progress using consistent metrics so remediation is steady, not reactive.

SynScan combines attack surface monitoring and continuous security auditing to keep your inventory current, flag high-impact vulnerabilities early, and help you turn raw findings into a practical remediation plan.